As a former Army infantry officer with combat experience in Vietnam, I remain deeply concerned for the U.S. military. Unfortunately, during my year in combat (almost all of 1968) I saw the worst of the chaplaincy. The chaplain in my infantry battalion was known for frequenting prostitutes. He was a good-old-boy, slap-you-on-the-back kind of chaplain who had nothing to give to men who were going out with the strong potential of dying. He was one of the "new" kind of chaplains. Certainly, no on would have slapped the label "fundamentalist" on him.
A friend who has access to such things in the military sent me the attached paper. While it does not yet represent the official position of the U.S. Army, it indicates the depth of the conflict taking place in the chaplains corp right now.
USAWC STRATEGY RESEARCH PROJECT
CHAPLAINCY AT A CROSSROADS: FUNDAMENTALIST
CHAPLAINS IN A
PLURALISTIC ARMY
by Chaplain (Colonel) Barbara
K. Sherer United States Army
This SRP is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Strategic Studies Degree. The U.S. Army War College is accredited by the Commission on
Higher Education of the Middle States Association of
Colleges and Schools, 3624
Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, (215) 662-5606. The Commission on Higher Education is an institutional accrediting agency recognized by the U.S. Secretary of
Education and the Council for Higher
Education Accreditation. The views expressed in this student academic research
paper are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, Department of
Defense,
or the U.S. Government.
U.S. Army War College
CARLISLE BARRACKS,
PENNSYLVANIA
17013
“The Chaplain Corps
is the Army’s primary agency for practically ensuring the
free exercise of religion for America’s soldiers.”1 The Army chaplain assumes many roles, functions,
and responsibilities in the
performance of duty,
but there
is none more key and essential
than this, the
Constitutional mandate
to ensure
the
free exercise
of religion.
Army chaplains2 represent a wide variety of denominations and faith groups, with
a broad base of theological beliefs. These
chaplains must work together collegially in order to provide religious support to
a very diverse soldier population. Yet
some
chaplains hold theological beliefs that
are very strict and unwavering. These strict beliefs make it a
challenge for the
chaplains to interact
comfortably with others who
do not have the same faith practices. An
example of
one
such belief set is Christian
Fundamentalism.
This paper will
examine
the beliefs and practices
of
Christian fundamentalists, and consider whether they conflict with
the Army chaplaincy stated mission to
ensure the free exercise of religion for America‟s soldiers. The paper will begin by defining the term
“fundamentalist” along with an
often associated term, “evangelical.” Next,
the author will
discuss the legal basis for
the
existence of the chaplaincy and various related
court cases and legal questions.
Following the legal
section the author will describe
some
of the challenges that
have occurred
when fundamentalist
chaplains minister in the pluralistic military community.
The
paper will close with
a discussion of the methods currently in place to
ensure
chaplains are capable of providing religious
support in the current environment and a few recommendations for ways the chaplaincy might
strengthen policies and training in order to protect the free exercise of religion.
The underlying theme
throughout the paper, which will be demonstrated in
both research and discussion, is that Christian fundamentalist beliefs, when
put
into
practice, may be incompatible with the
requirements to provide for
the
free exercise
of
religion in the pluralistic military environment. Chaplains who hold
these beliefs must either
moderate their actions and
refrain from imposing their theology and values on
others, or
risk infringing the rights of their soldiers.
No comments:
Post a Comment